• SyncroPatch 384

    Next level versatility and flexibility
  • SyncroPatch 384

    True HTS and GigaOhm seals
  • SyncroPatch 384

    Your multi purpose instrument
  • SyncroPatch 384

    Powerful analysis software
  • SyncroPatch 384

    Assay flexibility via high tech
  • SyncroPatch 384

    Heating and cooling of solutions, cells and patch clamp sites

2021 - Applying the CiPA Approach to Evaluate Cardiac Proarrhythmia Risk of some Antimalarials Used Off‐label in the First Wave of COVID‐19

icon sp96  SyncroPatch 384PE (a predecessor model of the SyncroPatch 384 instrument) prepublication in Clinical and Translational Science (2021)

Delaunois A., Abernathy M., Anderson W.D., Beattie K.A., Chaudhary K.W., Coulot J., Gryshkova V., Hebeisen S., Holbrook M., Kramer J., Kuryshev Y., Leishman D., Lushbough I., Passini E., Redfern W.S., Rodriguez B., Rossman E.I., Trovato C., Wu C., Valentin J-P.


Clinical and Translational Science (2021) doi: 10.1111/cts.13011


We applied a set of in silico and in vitro assays, compliant with the CiPA (Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay) paradigm, to assess the risk of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine‐mediated QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes (TdP), alone and combined with erythromycin and azithromycin, drugs repurposed during the first wave of COVID‐19. Each drug or drug combination was tested in patch clamp assays on 7 cardiac ion channels, in in silico models of human ventricular electrophysiology (Virtual Assay®) using control (healthy) or high‐risk cell populations, and in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)‐derived cardiomyocytes. In each assay, concentration‐response curves encompassing and exceeding therapeutic free plasma levels were generated. Both chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine showed blocking activity against some potassium, sodium and calcium currents. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine inhibited IKr (IC50: 1µM and 3‐7 µM, respectively) and IK1 currents (IC50: 5 and 44 µM, respectively). When combining hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin, no synergistic effects were observed. The two macrolides had no or very weak effects on the ion currents (IC50 > 300 ‐ 1000µM). Using Virtual Assay®, both antimalarials affected several TdP indicators, chloroquine being more potent than hydroxychloroquine. Effects were more pronounced in the high‐risk cell population. In hiPSC‐derived cardiomyocytes, all drugs showed early‐after‐depolarizations, except azithromycin. Combining chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine with a macrolide did not aggravate their effects. In conclusion, our integrated nonclinical CiPA dataset confirmed that, at therapeutic plasma concentrations relevant for malaria or off‐label use in COVID‐19, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine use is associated with a proarrhythmia risk, which is higher in populations carrying predisposing factors but not worsened with macrolide combination.

Download here.

Back to Overview

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.